Only a few years in the past, searching for case precedent was a challenging and time consuming process, requiring individuals to search through print copies of case law, or to pay for access to commercial online databases. Today, the internet has opened up a host of case law search choices, and a lot of sources offer free access to case law.
Some sites might specialize in specific areas of legislation, while others offer a broader database. Factors to take into account when deciding on a website include things like the comprehensiveness of the database, the benefit of navigation, as well as availability of advanced search options.
Case regulation is specific into the jurisdiction in which it absolutely was rendered. For example, a ruling in a California appellate court would not ordinarily be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
maintaining the conviction awarded into the appellant reduce the sentence from the appellant from imprisonment for life to 1 already undergone(Pakistan Penal Code)
139 . Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Offered the legal analysis on the topic issue, we have been of the view that the claim of the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their First contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle just isn't legally seem, besides promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, These are subject to rules and regulations If your recruitment rules of the subject post allow the case from the petitioners for promotion can be deemed, however, we have been apparent within our point of view that contractual service cannot be viewed as for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Conditioning, issue to availability of vacancy topic on the approval with the competent authority.
Power to levy tax and to legislate on immovable property which include tax on yearly rental value of immovable property after 18th Amendment(CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973)
ninety six . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be very well-settled that when taking into consideration the case of standard promotion of civil servants, the competent authority must take into account the benefit of the many qualified candidates and after because of deliberations, to grant promotion to this sort of eligible candidates who are found to be most meritorious among them. For the reason that petitioner was held to generally be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was ignored from the respondent department just to increase favor towards the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy about the part of your respondent department.
In fact, this provision nullifies the difference between manslaughter and murder. Section 318 in the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 defines Qatl-i-khata (manslaughter) as “Whoever, without intention to cause the death of or cause harm to the person causes death of these person, either by mistake of act or by mistake of fact is claimed to commit qatl-i-khata.”
nine. Needless to mention that any observations made in the above mentioned order are tentative in nature and shall not influence the trial Court.
When the petitioner is actually present with the place of event without causing any injury for more info the deceased or PWs then in this kind of circumstances, whether He's vicariously liable shall be decided because of the acquired trial Court after recording of your evidence.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury to your person, by executing an act which from the ordinary course of nature is likely to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently hazardous that it must in all likelihood cause death, causes the death on the such person, is said to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”
A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition for the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Development Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of the electricity grid station in their neighborhood, on designated “green belt” property. The Court heard the matter as being a human rights case, as Article 184 (three) from the Pakistan Constitution provides authentic jurisdiction to your Supreme Court to consider up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to ascertain a commission of internationally known and acknowledged scientists to review and rule on upcoming grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power strains.